Videolaryngoscopy in critical care and emergency locations: moving from debating benefit to implementation.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37507261.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.bja.2023.06.057.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The recently published INTUBE study subanalysis and DEVICE trial findings both demonstrate a clear benefit of videolaryngoscopy over direct laryngoscopy in facilitating tracheal intubation of patients in the emergency department and ICU. We consider the increasing evidence supporting the use of videolaryngoscopy, the possible reasons behind its relatively slow adoption into clinical practice, and the potential role of the hyperangulated videolaryngoscope blade. We discuss the significance of improved first-pass tracheal intubation success in reducing the overall risk of complications in critically ill patients. Additionally, we address the need for specific training in videolaryngoscopy in order to maximise patient benefit, and propose that adequate training and rehearsal opportunities in videolaryngoscopy can only be realised by widespread and regular use wherever the clinical setting.
Medical subject headings
- Laryngoscopy
- Laryngoscopes