Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: State of the Art in Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Application in Lower Extremity Orthopaedics.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37543754.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00586.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
With an increasing shift toward a value-based and outcome-driven healthcare system, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) will continue to play a prominent role in assessing performance, making clinical decisions, shared decision making, and determining the comparative effectiveness of procedures such as total joint arthroplasty for lower extremity conditions, such as ankle, hip, and knee osteoarthritis. As the application of PROMs in evaluating surgical outcomes has evolved from that of a research setting to that of a clinical setting, their use in the decision-making process has become more prevalent. As a result, preoperative optimization, surgical indications, and improved outcomes after surgery have been greatly enhanced. To enable benchmarking, quality reporting, and performance measurement at an aggregate level, it is crucial to have a comprehensive PROM collection system. However, achieving this goal is contingent upon addressing the variability in reported PROMs and the patient-centered benchmarks used to analyze clinical significance.
Medical subject headings
- Orthopedics
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anatomy
- knee