Pulmonary MRI with ultra-short TE using single- and dual-echo methods: comparison of capability for quantitative differentiation of non- or minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other lung cancers with that of standard-dose thin-section CT.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37580601.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-023-10105-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was thus to compare capabilities for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other of pulmonary MRIs with ultra-short TE (UTE) obtained with single- and dual-echo techniques (UTE-MRI<sub>Single</sub> and UTE-MRI<sub>Dual</sub>) and thin-section CT for stage IA lung cancer patients. Ninety pathologically diagnosed stage IA lung cancer patients who underwent thin-section standard-dose CT, UTE-MRI<sub>Single,</sub> and UTE-MRI<sub>Dual</sub>, surgical treatment and pathological examinations were included in this retrospective study. The largest dimension (D<sub>long</sub>), solid portion (solid D<sub>long</sub>), and consolidation/tumor (C/T) ratio of each nodule were assessed. Two-tailed Student's t-tests were performed to compare all indexes obtained with each method between non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and other lung cancers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-based positive tests were performed to determine all feasible threshold values for distinguishing non- or minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA) from other lung cancers. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were then compared by means of McNemar's test. Each index showed significant differences between the two groups (p < 0.0001). Specificities and accuracies of solid D<sub>long</sub> for UTE-MRI<sub>Dual2nd echo</sub> and CT<sub>Mediastinal</sub> were significantly higher than those of solid D<sub>long</sub> for UTE-MRI<sub>Single</sub> and UTE-MRI<sub>Dual1st echo</sub> and all C/T ratios except CT<sub>Mediastinal</sub> (p < 0.05). Moreover, the specificities and accuracies of solid D<sub>long</sub> and C/T ratio were significantly higher than those of D<sub>long</sub> for each method (p < 0.05). Pulmonary MRI with UTE is considered at least as valuable as thin-section CT for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other stage IA lung cancers. Pulmonary MRI with UTE's capability for quantitative differentiation of non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas from other lung cancers in stage IA lung cancer patients is equal or superior to that of thin-section CT. • Correlations were excellent for pathologically examined nodules with the largest dimensions (D<sub>long</sub>) and a solid component (solid D<sub>long</sub>) for all indexes (0.95 ≤ r ≤ 0.99, p < 0.0001). • Pathologically examined D<sub>long</sub> and solid D<sub>long</sub> obtained with all methods showed significant differences between non- and minimally invasive adenocarcinomas and other lung cancers (p < 0.0001). • Solid tumor components are most accurately measured by UTE-MRI<sub>Dual2nd echo</sub> and CT<sub>Mediastinal</sub>, whereas the ground-glass component is imaged by UTE-MRI<sub>Dual1st echo</sub> and CT<sub>lung</sub> with high accuracy. UTE-MRI<sub>Dual</sub> predicts tumor invasiveness with 100% sensitivity and 87.5% specificity at a C/T threshold of 0.5.
Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
- Adenocarcinoma
- Lung Diseases