Comparative Outcomes of Anterior and Posterior Plating for Distal-Third Humerus Shaft Fractures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37676188.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.07.014.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
When treating distal-third humerus shaft fractures (HSFs) surgically, the optimal approach for plating is controversial. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes of anterior and posterior plating in distal-third HSFs and the incidence of complications including iatrogenic radial nerve palsy. We identified 116 patients from our multicenter trauma database who were diagnosed as having distal-third HSFs and who underwent surgical treatment, including intramedullary nailing between 2011 and 2020. We analyzed 50 cases treated in one of two ways: open reduction internal fixation with anterior plating (group A: 20 cases) and open reduction internal fixation with posterior plating (group P: 30 cases). The findings were similar in terms of operation time, estimated bleeding, and clinical and radiographic outcomes between the groups. Postoperative radial nerve palsy occurred only in group P (4 cases) and never in group A. The results of this study suggest that the anterior approach is a safe and effective method for treating distal-third HSFs with satisfactory outcomes. Therapeutic IV.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Plates
- Humeral Fractures
- Fracture Fixation, Internal
Anatomy
- humerus
- radius