Biostatistical Estimation of Tau Threshold Hallmarks (BETTH) Algorithm for Human Tau PET Imaging Studies.

Gogola, Alexandra; Lopresti, Brian J; Tudorascu, Dana; Snitz, Beth; Minhas, Davneet; Doré, Vincent; Ikonomovic, Milos D; Shaaban, C Elizabeth et al. · J Nucl Med · 2023

Where this comes from

Abstract

A methodology for determining tau PET thresholds is needed to confidently detect early tau deposition. We compared multiple threshold-determining methods in participants who underwent either <sup>18</sup>F-flortaucipir or <sup>18</sup>F-MK-6240 PET scans. <b>Methods:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-flortaucipir (<i>n</i> = 798) and <sup>18</sup>F-MK-6240 (<i>n</i> = 216) scans were processed and sampled to obtain regional SUV ratios. Subsamples of the cohorts were based on participant diagnosis, age, amyloid-β status (positive or negative), and neurodegeneration status (positive or negative), creating older-adult (age ≥ 55 y) cognitively unimpaired (amyloid-β-negative, neurodegeneration-negative) and cognitively impaired (mild cognitive impairment/Alzheimer disease, amyloid-β-positive, neurodegeneration-positive) groups, and then were further subsampled via matching to reduce significant differences in diagnostic prevalence, age, and Mini-Mental State Examination score. We used the biostatistical estimation of tau threshold hallmarks (BETTH) algorithm to determine sensitivity and specificity in 6 composite regions. <b>Results:</b> Parametric double receiver operating characteristic analysis yielded the greatest joint sensitivity in 5 of the 6 regions, whereas hierarchic clustering, gaussian mixture modeling, and k-means clustering all yielded perfect joint specificity (2.00) in all regions. <b>Conclusion:</b> When <sup>18</sup>F-flortaucipir and <sup>18</sup>F-MK-6240 are used, Alzheimer disease-related tau status is best assessed using 2 thresholds, a sensitivity one based on parametric double receiver operating characteristic analysis and a specificity one based on gaussian mixture modeling, delimiting an uncertainty zone indicating participants who may require further evaluation.

Medical subject headings