Legionella pneumonia in hospitalized adults with respiratory failure: Quinolones or macrolides?
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37730517.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.09.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The optimal antimicrobial regimen for adults with respiratory failure due to Legionella pneumonia remains controversial. A systematic review was performed to assess the impact on outcomes comparing quinolones versus macrolides. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science between 2012 and 2022. It yielded 124 potentially articles and ten observational studies met the inclusion criteria. A total of 4271 patients were included, 2879 (67 %) were male. A total of 1797 (42 %) subjects required intensive care unit (ICU) admission and 942 (52 %) mechanical ventilation. Fluoroquinolones and macrolides alone were administered in 1397 (33 %) and 1500 (35 %) subjects, respectively; combined therapy in 204 (4.8 %) patients. Overall mortality was 7.4 % (319 patients), with no difference between antibiotics. When data from the three studies with severe pneumonia were pooled together, mortality with fluoroquinolones alone was statistically superior to macrolides alone (72.8 % vs 30.8 %, p value 0.027). Hospital length of stay and complications were comparable. Our findings suggest that macrolides and quinolones were comparable for hospitalized Legionella pneumonia. However, in severe pneumonia, a randomized clinical trial is an unmet clinical need. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023389308.
Medical subject headings
- Macrolides
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Respiratory Insufficiency
- Legionnaires' Disease