Biomechanics of Cervical Disk Replacement: Classifying Arthroplasty Implants.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37735758.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001523.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Cervical disk arthroplasty has been employed with increased frequency over the past 2 decades as a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in select patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy secondary to degenerative disk disease. As indications continue to expand, an understanding of cervical kinematics and materials science is helpful for optimal implant selection. Cervical disk arthroplasty implants can be classified according to the mode of articulation and df , articulation material, and endplate construction. The incorporation of translational and rotational df allows the implant to emulate the dynamic and coupled centers of movement in the cervical spine. Durable and low-friction interfaces at the articulation sustain optimal performance and minimize particulate-induced tissue reactions. Endplate materials must facilitate osseous integration to ensure implant stability after primary fixation. These cardinal considerations underlie the design of the 9 implants currently approved by the FDA and serve as the foundation for further biomimetic research and development.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty
- Spinal Fusion
Anatomy
- cervical spine