Comparison research on the therapeutic effects of botulinum toxin type A and stromal vascular fraction gel on hypertrophic scars in the rabbit ear model.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37783633.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2023.09.010.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is often used for wrinkles and muscle convulsive diseases due to its blocking of the transmission of nerve impulses. Stromal vascular fraction gel (SVF-gel) prepared from adipose tissue has novel effects on skin depression and poor texture. Both BTA and SVF-gel are proved to possess anti-scar potential. This study aimed to assess and compare their therapeutic effects on hypertrophic scars. The rabbit ear scar model was established and treated with BTA and SVF-gel, alone or in combination. Gross evaluation using Manchester Scar Scale (MSS) was conducted immediately, 4 and 8 weeks after initial treatment. After tissue sample harvest, histological and Western blot analyses were performed. All the treatments alleviated scar hyperplasia in different degrees by inhibiting fibroblast activation (Ki-67, α-SMA), tissue inflammation (CD45, IL-1β) and the transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)/Smad3 pathway. Despite an excellent anti-inflammatory effect, improvement of scar appearance and pathological characteristics in SVF-gel-contained groups was not as good as that in BTA-only group, which might be related to the retention of M2-type macrophages (CD163 +) and partial maintenance of TGF-β1 expression. Our data suggest that BTA has better anti-scar efficacy than SVF-gel, and the combination of these two treatments shows no obvious combinatorial effect.
Medical subject headings
- Cicatrix, Hypertrophic
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- Burns