Global Perceptions on ERAS<sup>®</sup> in Pancreatoduodenectomy.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37787776.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00268-023-07198-9 and PMC identifier 10694106.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Uptake of ERAS<sup>®</sup> pathways for pancreatic surgery have been slow and impacted by low compliance. To explore global awareness, perceptions and practice of ERAS<sup>®</sup> peri-pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). A structured, web-based survey (EPSILON) was administered through the ERAS<sup>®</sup> society and IHPBA membership. The 140 respondents included predominantly males (86.4%), from Europe (45%), practicing surgery (95%) at academic/teaching hospitals (63.6%) over a period of 10-20 years (38.6%). Most respondents identified themselves as general surgeons (68.6%) with 40.7% reporting an annual PD volume of 20-50 cases, practicing post-PD clinical pathways (37.9%), with 31.4% of respondents auditing their outcomes annually. Reduced medical complications, cost and hospital length of stay, and improved patient satisfaction were perceived benefits of compliance to enhancing-recovery. Multidisciplinary co-ordination was considered the most important factor in the implementation and sustainability of peri-PD ERAS<sup>®</sup> pathways, while reluctance to change among health care practitioners, difficulties in data collection and audit, lack of administrative support, and recruitment of an ERAS<sup>®</sup> dedicated nurse were reported to be important barriers. The EPSILON survey highlighted global clinician perceptions regarding the benefits of compliance to peri-PD ERAS<sup>®</sup>, the importance of individual components, perceived facilitators and barriers, to the implementation and sustainability of these pathways.
Medical subject headings
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- Patient Satisfaction