AI Model Versus Clinician Otoscopy in the Operative Setting for Otitis Media Diagnosis.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37822130.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/ohn.559.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Prior work has demonstrated improved accuracy in otitis media diagnosis based on otoscopy using artificial intelligence (AI)-based approaches compared to clinician evaluation. However, this difference in accuracy has not been shown in a setting resembling the point-of-care. In this study, we compare the diagnostic accuracy of a machine-learning model to that of pediatricians using standard handheld otoscopes. We find that the model is more accurate than clinicians (90.6% vs 59.4%, P = .01). This is a step towards validation of AI-based diagnosis under more real-world conditions. With further validation, for example on different patient populations and in deployment, this technology could be a useful addition to the clinician's toolbox in accurately diagnosing otitis media.
Medical subject headings
- Otitis Media
- Otoscopy
- Artificial Intelligence