Editorial Commentary: Evaluation of Patellofemoral Instability Is Complex and Multifactorial.

Abstract

The work-up of patellofemoral instability is complex and multifactorial. Patient factors (i.e., age, activity demand, goals/expectations), clinical presentation (pain, instability, or both), and physical examination (i.e., J-sign, apprehension into flexion), must be correlated with imaging findings (radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography) and anatomic risk factors, including patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, patellar tilt, lateralized force vector, valgus, femoral anteversion, and tibial torsion. Thus, developing a standard battery of reliable and reproducible radiographic measures of patellofemoral instability is a challenge. Imaging cut-offs provide insight into relative risk of recurrent instability. We still fall short in using imaging parameters to predict when to operate, what procedure(s) to perform, and how the patient might do. Future directions include the use of artificial intelligence and 3-dimensional measurements to help simplify a complex problem.