MAX, MXene, or MX: What Are They and Which One Is Better?
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37875430.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/adma.202306072.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The fast ever-growing interest in transition metal carbonitrides (MXenes) for energy and catalysis is undermined by the undesirable multi-surficial terminations, which severely limit their applications. In contrast, considering the intriguing and tunable electronic structure, rich surface active sites, and high thermal durability, termination-free MXene (MX) hosts a huge possibility for catalysis. As such, recent advances in the evolution from MAX to MXene, and then to MX are overviewed and compared briefly, before concentrating on the unique future of MX in multi-heterogeneous catalysis. This work also looks beyond the fundamental properties of MX and discusses the potential of such materials for applications in multi-electron redox reactions. It is convinced that the potential success of MX in future catalysis is promising. Further extension toward high entropy and single-atom modifications will consolidate the leading position of MX in catalysis.