Sensory nerve transfers in the upper limb after peripheral nerve injury: a scoping review.
review · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37987686.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934231205546 and PMC identifier 11382435.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Nerve transfer for motor nerve paralysis is an established technique for treating complex nerve injuries. However, nerve transfer for sensory reconstruction has not been widely used, and published research on this topic is limited compared to motor nerve transfer. The indications and outcomes of nerve transfer for the restoration of sensory function remain unproven. This scoping review examines the indications, outcomes and complications of sensory nerve transfer. In total, 22 studies were included; the major finding is that distal sensory nerve transfers are more successful than proximal ones in succeeding protective sensation. Although the risk of extension of the sensory deficit with donor site loss and morbidity from neuromas remain a barrier to wider adoption, these complications were not reported in the review. Further, the scarcity of studies and small patient series limit the ability to determine sensory nerve transfer success. However, sensory restoration remains an opportunity for surgeons to pursue.<b>Level of evidence:</b> II.
Medical subject headings
- Humans
- Nerve Transfer
- Nerve Transfer/methods
- Peripheral Nerve Injuries
- Peripheral Nerve Injuries/surgery
- Upper Extremity
- Upper Extremity/innervation
- Upper Extremity/surgery
- Upper Extremity/injuries
- Peripheral Nerves
- Peripheral Nerves/transplantation