Safety and Efficacy of Clofazimine as an Alternative for Rifampicin in Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease Treatment: Outcomes of a Randomized Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38040054.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2023.11.038.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Results of retrospective studies have suggested clofazimine as an alternative for rifampicin in the treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD). Is a treatment regimen consisting of clofazimine-ethambutol-macrolide noninferior to the standard treatment regimen (rifampicin-ethambutol-macrolide) in the treatment of MAC-PD? In this single-center, nonanonymized clinical trial, adult patients with MAC-PD were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive rifampicin or clofazimine as adjuncts to an ethambutol-macrolide regimen. The primary outcome was sputum culture conversion following 6 months of treatment. Forty patients were assigned to receive either rifampicin (n = 19) or clofazimine (n = 21) in addition to ethambutol and a macrolide. Following 6 months of treatment, both arms showed similar percentages of sputum culture conversion based on an intention-to-treat analysis: 58% (11 of 19) for rifampicin and 62% (13 of 21) for clofazimine. Study discontinuation, mainly due to adverse events, was equal in both arms (26% vs 33%). Based on an on-treatment analysis, sputum culture conversion following 6 months of treatment was 79% in both groups. In the clofazimine arm, diarrhea was more prevalent (76% vs 37%; P = .012), while arthralgia was more frequent in the rifampicin arm (37% vs 5%; P = .011). No difference in the frequency of corrected QT interval prolongation was seen between groups. A clofazimine-ethambutol-macrolide regimen showed similar results to the standard rifampicin-ethambutol-macrolide regimen and should be considered in the treatment of MAC-PD. The frequency of adverse events was similar in both arms, but their nature was different. Individual patient characteristics and possible drug-drug interactions should be taken into consideration when choosing an antibiotic regimen for MAC-PD. EudraCT; No.: 2015-003786-28; URL: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu.
Medical subject headings
- Rifampin
- Clofazimine
- Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection
- Ethambutol
- Drug Therapy, Combination
- Mycobacterium avium Complex