Symptomatic carotid artery intraluminal thrombus: risk of medical management failure and distal embolization.

Schartz, Derrek; Susa, Stephen; Ellens, Nathaniel; Akkipeddi, Sajal Medha K; Houk, Clifton; Bhalla, Tarun; Mattingly, Thomas; Hasan, David et al. · J Neurointerv Surg · 2024

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

Carotid artery intraluminal thrombus (ILT), or free-floating thrombus, is an uncommon cerebrovascular entity with considerable equipoise regarding its clinical management. Likewise, in patients treated with medical management (MM), distal embolization and/or intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) may still occur. All patients with symptomatic ILT from 2016 to 2023 were identified from our tertiary care institution. Patients with MM failure (recurrent cerebral ischemia and/or symptomatic ICH) were compared with patients with MM non-failure. Differences in ILT volume and length were calculated. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the cut-off volume and length for risk of MM failure. In total, 45 patients with ILT were identified with 41 treated with frontline MM. Of these 41 patients treated with MM, seven (17%) had MM failure with six (14.6%) having new embolic stroke and one (2.3%) with symptomatic ICH. Patients with MM failure had a significantly higher mean thrombus volume than MM non-failure patients (257 mm<sup>3</sup> vs 59.6 mm<sup>3</sup>, P=0.0006). Likewise, patients with MM failure had significantly longer thrombus on average (21 mm vs 6.6 mm, P=0.0009). ROC curve analysis showed that an ILT volume of 90 mm<sup>3</sup> resulted in a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 85.3% for MM failure (AUC 0.775; CI 0.55 to 1.0, P=0.023). Carotid ILTs that fail MM are significantly larger and longer. These findings suggest that a thrombus volume of 90 mm<sup>3</sup> may serve as a guide for intervention with good sensitivity and specificity for risk of MM failure.

Medical subject headings