Students experienced near peer-led simulation in physiotherapy education as valuable and engaging: a mixed methods study.

Abstract

What is the student experience of near peer-led simulation in physiotherapy education from the perspectives of students (near peer learners and near peer teachers)? What are their expectations, perceptions and engagement in this as a teaching and learning activity? Are there any short-term benefits? Convergent mixed-methods study. From a graduate entry Doctor of Physiotherapy course, 111 first-year and 20 second-year students participated. Near peer-led simulation was delivered within first-year cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal and neurological physiotherapy curricula and as a precursor to second-year clinical placements. First-year students were near peer learners. Second-year students were near peer teachers and the simulated patients. Focus groups, pre/post-simulation questionnaires and direct observation. Data were triangulated and presented in overall themes. Five themes emerged: near peer-led simulation improved the students' confidence and the opportunity to make mistakes in a supportive and safe environment was valued; peer feedback was an integral part of the learning process that enriched the learning experience; the authenticity and realism created seriousness, promoted engagement and facilitated perceived knowledge transfer; there were benefits for learning for both peer learners and peer teachers; and the anticipation and emotional impact was evident. Near peer-led simulation was viewed by students as a valuable and engaging activity. Students perceived a broad range of benefits on their learning, especially from peer feedback (giving and receiving) on their performance, and had increased confidence following simulation. Peer-led simulation is an authentic and valuable component of entry-to-practice physiotherapy education.