FDA Approval Summary: Olaparib in Combination With Abiraterone for Treatment of Patients With <i>BRCA</i>-Mutated Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Fallah, Jaleh; Xu, Jianjin; Weinstock, Chana; Brave, Michael H; Bloomquist, Erik; Fiero, Mallorie H; Schaefer, Timothy; Pathak, Anand et al. · J Clin Oncol · 2024

rct · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

This article summarizes the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of the data leading to approval of olaparib plus abiraterone for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious <i>BRCA</i>-mutated (<i>BRCA</i>m) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test. Approval was based on the results from PROpel, a double-blind trial that randomly assigned 796 patients with mCRPC to abiraterone plus prednisone or prednisolone with either olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per investigator assessment. There was a statistically significant improvement in rPFS for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone, with a median rPFS of 25 versus 17 months and a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.81) in the intention-to-treat population. In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 85 patients with <i>BRCA</i>m mCRPC, the HR for rPFS was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.45) and the HR for overall survival (OS) was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.59). In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 711 patients without an identified <i>BRCA</i> mutation, the HR for rPFS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96) and the HR for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.14). Adding olaparib to abiraterone resulted in increased toxicity, including anemia requiring transfusion in 18% of patients. In patients with mCRPC, efficacy of the combination of olaparib plus abiraterone was primarily attributed to the treatment effect in the <i>BRCA</i>m subgroup, the indicated population for the approval. For patients without <i>BRCA</i>m, the FDA determined that the modest rPFS improvement, combined with clinically significant toxicities, did not demonstrate a favorable risk/benefit assessment.

Medical subject headings