Weaker Quadriceps Muscle Strength With a Quadriceps Tendon Graft Compared With a Patellar or Hamstring Tendon Graft at 7 Months After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38164665.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/03635465231209442 and PMC identifier 10762885.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Impaired quadriceps muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is associated with worse clinical outcomes and a risk of reinjuries. Yet, we know little about quadriceps muscle strength in patients reconstructed with a quadriceps tendon (QT) graft, which is increasing in popularity worldwide. To describe and compare isokinetic quadriceps strength in patients undergoing ACLR with a QT, hamstring tendon (HT), or bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft. Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. We included patients with QT grafts (n = 104) and matched them to patients with HT (n = 104) and BPTB (n = 104) grafts based on age, sex, and associated meniscal surgery. Data were collected through clinical strength testing at a mean of 7 ± 1 months postoperatively. Isokinetic strength was measured at 90 deg/s, and quadriceps strength was expressed as the limb symmetry index (LSI) for peak torque, total work, torque at 30° of knee flexion, and time to peak torque. Patients with QT grafts had the most impaired isokinetic quadriceps strength, with the LSI ranging between 67.5% and 75.1%, followed by those with BPTB grafts (74.4%-81.5%) and HT grafts (84.0%-89.0%). Patients with QT grafts had a significantly lower LSI for all variables compared with patients with HT grafts (mean difference: peak torque: -17.4% [95% CI, -21.7 to -13.2], <i>P</i> < .001; total work: -15.9% [95% CI, -20.6 to -11.1], <i>P</i> < .001; torque at 30° of knee flexion: -8.8% [95% CI, -14.7 to -2.9], <i>P</i> = .001; time to peak torque: -17.7% [95% CI, -25.8 to -9.6], <i>P</i> < .001). Compared with patients with BPTB grafts, patients with QT grafts had a significantly lower LSI for all variables (mean difference: peak torque: -6.9% [95% CI, -11.2 to -2.7], <i>P</i> < .001; total work: -7.7% [95% CI, -12.4 to -2.9], <i>P</i> < .001; torque at 30° of knee flexion: -6.3% [95% CI, -12.2 to -0.5], <i>P</i> = .03; time to peak torque: -8.8% [95% CI, -16.9 to -0.7], <i>P</i> = .03). None of the graft groups reached a mean LSI of >90% for peak torque (QT: 67.5% [95% CI, 64.8-70.1]; HT: 84.9% [95% CI, 82.4-87.4]; BPTB: 74.4% [95% CI, 72.0-76.9]). At 7 months after ACLR, patients with QT grafts had significantly worse isokinetic quadriceps strength than patients with HT and BPTB grafts. None of the 3 graft groups reached a mean LSI of >90% in quadriceps strength.
Medical subject headings
- Hamstring Tendons
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Patellar Ligament
Anatomy
- knee