Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: Updated meta-analysis of real-world clinical outcome after RESCUE-ASDH trial.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38197651.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/TA.0000000000004243.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Randomized Evaluation of Surgery with Craniectomy for Patients Undergoing Evacuation of Acute Subdural Hematoma trial found that disability and quality-of-life outcomes were similar between craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for traumatic acute subdural hematoma (ASDH), contrasting previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to validate the applicability of RESCUE-ASDH results using real-world data in ASDH patients. We searched Chocrane, Embase, and MEDLINE for relevant articles reporting clinical outcomes of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy. Meta-analysis used R software (Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman at the University of Auckland, New Zealand) with the restricted maximum likelihood method for random-effects meta-analyses, presenting odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment for heterogeneity. Besides RESCUE-ASDH, five retrospective studies were included, spanning 2006 to 2016. A total of 961 patients with traumatic ASDH were included in this study (craniotomy, 467; decompressive craniotomy, 494). The pooled analysis of retrospective studies showed no significant difference in poor clinical outcomes between the two groups (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.10). These findings align with the RESCUE-ASDH trial (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.58-1.23). Mortality rate was significantly higher in patients undergoing craniectomy in pooled result of retrospective studies (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.10). In RESCUE-ASDH trial, reoperation rate was higher in the craniotomy group, but the pooled result of retrospective did not show significant difference between the craniotomy and craniectomy group. This real-world evidence confirms the RESCUE-ASDH trial results. Both craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy yielded similar disability and quality-of-life outcomes for traumatic ASDH patients. Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis; Level III.
Medical subject headings
- Craniotomy
- Decompressive Craniectomy
- Hematoma, Subdural, Acute