HIV policies in Australian prisons: a structured review assessing compliance with international guidelines.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38223398.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100813 and PMC identifier 10786648.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Globally, people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) are over-represented in incarcerated populations. The current study aimed to provide a national (Australian) snapshot of current HIV prison policies against the United Nations' (UN) 15 key HIV interventions for prisons. Publicly available policies, reports, and data were obtained, and interviews were conducted with prison health staff in five of eight Australian jurisdictions. We rated whether policies were compliant, partially compliant, or not compliant to the UN interventions and assigned an overall grade (A to E, where A = most compliant and E = least compliant) for each jurisdiction. Three jurisdictions received a B grade, three received a C grade, and two were not assessed due to insufficient data. In all jurisdictions HIV policies fell short of full compliance to most UN interventions. Prison-based needle and syringe programs and initiatives beyond education to reduce HIV transmission from body modification procedures (eg, tattooing) were absent in all jurisdictions. No condom programme existed in one jurisdiction and access issues were reported in others. Opioid substitution therapy, and peer-education access varied across and within most jurisdictions. Findings indicate that more action is required to meet the UN recommended interventions for HIV prevention in prisons.