Talar and fibular histiocytic-driven massive expansile osteolysis following polyetheretherketone interference screw implantation: a case report.
case_report · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38266965.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.01.009.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Numerous interference screws of different compositions exist including titanium screws, bioabsorbable screws, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) screws. PEEK-based implants are frequently used in orthopaedic surgery due to their biocompatibility, similar elastic modulus to cortical bone, and purported negligible risk of osteolysis compared with bioabsorbable screws. In this case report, we present the case of a 48-year-old healthy female who experienced a massive osteolytic reaction in the talus and fibula after 11 weeks following implantation of PEEK-based interference screws during lateral ankle ligament reconstruction. The patient subsequently underwent removal of the PEEK screws and specimens were sent for microbiological and histopathological analysis. The specimens report demonstrated fibrotic tenosynovial soft tissue with patchy chronic inflammation, oedematous reactive changes, and histiocytic reaction, with no evidence of any significant acute inflammation. The patient recovered well and was asymptomatic at 6 months postoperatively. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a massive osteolytic reaction to PEEK-based interference screws.
Medical subject headings
- Osteolysis
- Benzophenones
- Bone Screws
- Ketones
- Polyethylene Glycols
- Polymers
- Fibula
- Talus
Anatomy
- ankle