Comparison of Balloon Guide Catheters and Standard Guide Catheters for Acute Ischemic Stroke: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to update our 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis which reported that balloon guide catheters (BGC) are associated with superior clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to standard guide catheters for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. We conducted a systematic review of 7 electronic databases to identify literature published between January 2010 and September 2023 reporting BGC versus non-BGC approaches. Primary outcomes were final modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) ≥2b, first-pass effect (mTICI ≥2c on first pass), and modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 90 days. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. A separate random effects model was fitted for each outcome. Subgroup analyses by first-line approach were conducted. Twenty-four studies comprising 8583 patients were included (4948 BGC; 3635 non-BGC; 1561 BGC + Stent-retriever; 1297 non-BGC + Stent-retriever). Nine studies had low risk of bias, 3 were moderate risk, and 12 were high risk. Patients treated with BGCs had higher odds of achieving mTICI 2b/3, first-pass effect mTICI 2c/3, and modified Rankin scale 0-2 at 90 days (P < 0.001). The number of patients needed to treat in order to achieve one additional successful recanalization is 17. BGC + Stent-retriever was associated with higher odds of mTICI≥2b, 90-day modified Rankin scale 0-2, and reduced odds of 90-day mortality compared to non-BGC + Stent-retrievers. The main limitation was the absence of randomized trials. These findings corroborate our previous results suggesting that MT using BGCs is associated with better safety and effectiveness outcomes for acute ischemic stroke, especially BGC + Stent-retrievers.