Transforming research systems for meaningful engagement: a reflexive thematic analysis of spinal cord injury researchers' barriers and facilitators to using the integrated knowledge translation guiding principles.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38353259.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2024.2310171.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To develop an in-depth understanding of spinal cord injury (SCI) researchers' barriers and facilitators to deciding to use 1) a partnered approach to research and, 2) systematically developed principles for guiding Integrated Knowledge Translation (IKT) in spinal cord injury research (IKT Guiding Principles). Qualitative interview study with North American SCI researchers who were interested in using a partnered research approach. The research was conducted using an IKT approach, and interview data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Thirteen SCI researchers whose research focused on prevention, clinical, rehabilitation, and/or community SCI research were interviewed. Three themes were co-constructed with partners: 1) the principles are necessary but not sufficient for the implementation of a partnered approach to research; 2) relational capacity building is needed; and 3) institutional transformation is needed to value, resource, and support meaningful engagement. Supporting change that enables SCI researchers to adopt and implement the IKT Guiding Principles will require transformation at the individual (<i>theme 1</i>), relational (<i>theme 2</i>), and institutional levels (<i>theme 3</i>). Findings provide clear, practical, and tangible actions to promote change that can support meaningful engagement in the SCI Research System.
Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Qualitative Research
- Translational Research, Biomedical
- Research Personnel