Sources and perceived credibility of child nutrition information in relation to maternal health literacy.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38359589.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108199 and PMC identifier 11271702.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To examine sources and perceived credibility of child nutrition information by maternal health literacy. US mothers of children (0-12 years) who used social media regularly (N = 340) completed an online survey. Health literacy was assessed using the Newest Vital Sign. Child nutrition information sources and perceived credibility of sources were compared by health literacy using logistic and quantile regression models. Seventeen percent of mothers had limited health literacy. Compared to mothers with adequate health literacy, those with limited health literacy were more likely to get child nutrition information from siblings, extended family, dietitians, doctors, nurse practitioners, or physician assistants, and government agencies, and less likely to get information from Facebook. Mothers with limited health literacy rated information from parents, friends, Facebook, and Instagram as more credible than mothers with adequate health literacy. While perceived credibility of information from doctors, nurse practitioners, or physician assistants was high overall, mothers with limited health literacy perceived information from these health care providers as less credible. Sources of child nutrition information and perceived credibility differ by maternal health literacy. Pediatric providers are encouraged to refer parents to engaging resources that provide evidence-based child nutrition information.
Medical subject headings
- Health Literacy
- Nutritionists
- Social Media