Comparison of non-pharmaceutical treatments for evaporative dry eye: a randomised controlled study protocol.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38413161.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078727 and PMC identifier 10900569.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The lipid layer of the tear film is critical to maintaining the integrity of the tear film and absence in the tear film lipid layer (TFLL) is one of the main causes of evaporative dry eye (EDE) in dry eye disease patients, resulting in excessive evaporation (so-called hyperevaporative dry eye). This study protocol will be designed to assess and compare the effects of intense pulsed light (IPL), heated eye mask (HEM), vectored thermal pulsation system (VTPS) and eyelid massage device (EMD) for improving signs and symptoms of EDE. Patients with EDE will be randomly divided into IPL, HEM, VTPS and EMD groups and will be followed up for 6 weeks. The primary outcome measure will be non-invasive tear breakup time (NITBUT). The secondary outcome measures will include, TFLL score, meibomian gland quality and expressibility change from baseline conjunctivocorneal staining with fluorescein and lissamine, tear meniscus height, conjunctival hyperaemia (redness score) and ocular surface disease index questionnaire. Additionally, adverse events will be monitored and documented. Ethics approval number: IRB(2023)K019.01. The findings will be shared regardless of the effect's direction. NCT05923528.
Medical subject headings
- Meibomian Glands
- Dry Eye Syndromes