Non-indicated vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-testing among Dutch hospital clinicians: a cross-sectional analysis in data registries.

Müskens, Joris Ljm; Kool, Rudolf Bertijn; Westert, Gert P; Zaal, Maarten; Muller, Hein; Atsma, Femke; van Dulmen, S A · BMJ Open · 2024

cross_sectional · Level IV

Where this comes from

Abstract

To assess the extent of non-indicated vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-testing among Dutch clinicians and its variation among hospitals. Cross-sectional study using registration data from 2015 to 2019. Patients aged between 18 and 70 years who received a vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- or D-test. The proportion of non-indicated vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-testing among Dutch clinicians and its variation between hospitals (n=68) over 2015-2019. Between 2015 and 2019, at least 79.0% of all vitamin B<sub>12</sub>-tests and 82.0% of vitamin D-tests lacked a clear indication. The number of vitamin B<sub>12</sub>-tests increased by 2.0% over the examined period, while the number of D-tests increased by 12.2%. The proportion of the unexplained variation in non-indicated vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-tests that can be ascribed to differences between hospitals remained low. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.072 and 0.085 and 0.081 and 0.096 for non-indicated vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-tests, respectively. The included casemix variables patient age, gender, socioeconomic status and hospital size only accounted for a small part of the unexplained variation in non-indicated testing. Additionally, a significant correlation was observed in non-indicated vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-testing among the included hospitals. Hospital clinicians order vitamin B<sub>12</sub>- and D-tests without a clear indication on a large scale. Only a small proportion of the unexplained variation could be attributed to differences between hospitals.

Medical subject headings