Closed versus medial open reduction in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip under age 1: A retrospective comparative study.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the mid-term results of closed reduction (CR) versus medial open reduction (MOR) in the treatment of children with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) under age 1. Thirty-four patients with DDH (41 hips) were included in this retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range: 2-6.9 years). All hips were then divided into 2 groups based on the treatment type: the CR group (20 hips) and the MOR group (21 hips). All hips from both groups were assessed with post-spica magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the first 24 hours, and reinterventions were recorded. Medial dye pool width was also measured. Age at the time of reduction was similar between the CR and MOR groups (6.6 ± 1.3 months vs. 6.7 ± 1.6 months). There was no significant difference between groups regarding avascular necrosis rate and further corrective surgery (FCS) requirement (P=.454, .697). The appropriate reduction was seen at 38/41 hips. Three hips in the CR group had revealed dislocation in post-spica MRIs and required re-intervention, and none of the hips in the MOR group required re-intervention (P=.107). Medial dye pool width in 3 planes showed no significant difference between MOR and CR. There is no difference in the avascular necrosis rate and FCS requirements between CR and MOR under age 1. Post-spica MRI is a favorable tool for evaluating reduction after CR, but its efficacy after MOR is questionable.