Generative artificial intelligence and non-pharmacological bias: an experimental study on cancer patient sexual health communications.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38575326.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100924 and PMC identifier 11002430.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<b>Objectives</b> The objective of this study was to explore the feature of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in asking sexual health among cancer survivors, which are often challenging for patients to discuss.<b>Methods</b> We employed the Generative Pre-trained Transformer-3.5 (GPT) as the generative AI platform and used DocsBot for citation retrieval (June 2023). A structured prompt was devised to generate 100 questions from the AI, based on epidemiological survey data regarding sexual difficulties among cancer survivors. These questions were submitted to Bot1 (standard GPT) and Bot2 (sourced from two clinical guidelines).<b>Results</b> No censorship of sexual expressions or medical terms occurred. Despite the lack of reflection on guideline recommendations, 'consultation' was significantly more prevalent in both bots' responses compared with pharmacological interventions, with ORs of 47.3 (p<0.001) in Bot1 and 97.2 (p<0.001) in Bot2.<b>Discussion</b> Generative AI can serve to provide health information on sensitive topics such as sexual health, despite the potential for policy-restricted content. Responses were biased towards non-pharmacological interventions, which is probably due to a GPT model designed with the 's prohibition policy on replying to medical topics. This shift warrants attention as it could potentially trigger patients' expectations for non-pharmacological interventions.
Medical subject headings
- Health Communication
- Sexual Health
- Neoplasms