Do patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus included in randomised clinical trials differ from general-practice patients? A cross-sectional comparative study.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38604640.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077582 and PMC identifier 11015222.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in general practice and those included in randomised controlled trials on which clinical practice guidelines are based. Cross-sectional comparative study. We asked 45 general practitioners from three French Departments to identify the 15 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus they most recently saw in consultation. In parallel, we selected randomised controlled trials included in the Cochrane systematic review on which the clinical practice guidelines for type 2 diabetes mellitus were based. We included 675 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and data were collected from 23 randomised controlled trials, corresponding to 36 059 patients. Characteristics of general-practice patients were extracted from medical records by a unique observer. The same baseline characteristics of patients included in randomised controlled trials from the Cochrane systematic review were extracted and meta-analysed. We assessed standardised differences between these two series of baseline characteristics. A difference greater than 0.10 in absolute value was considered meaningful. General-practice patients were older than randomised controlled trial patients (mean (SD) 68.8 (1.1) vs 59.9 years (standardised difference 0.8)) and had a higher body mass index (mean (SD) 31.5 (6.9) vs 28.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (standardised difference 0.5)) but smoked less (11.0% vs 29.3% (standardised difference -0.6)). They more frequently used antihypertensive drugs (82.1% vs 37.5% (standardised difference 1.2)) but less frequently had a myocardial infarction (7.6% vs 23.1% (standardised difference -1.1)). Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus cared for in general practice differ in a number of important aspects from patients included in randomised controlled trials on which clinical practice guidelines are based. This situation hampers the applicability of these guidelines. Future randomised trials should include patients who better fit the 'average' general-practice patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus to help improve the translation of study findings in daily practice.
Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- General Practice