Evaluating the validity of the nursing statements algorithmically generated based on the International Classifications of Nursing Practice for respiratory nursing care using large language models.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38630586.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocae070 and PMC identifier 11105147.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aims to facilitate the creation of quality standardized nursing statements in South Korea's hospitals using algorithmic generation based on the International Classifications of Nursing Practice (ICNP) and evaluation through Large Language Models. We algorithmically generated 15 972 statements related to acute respiratory care using 117 concepts and concept composition models of ICNP. Human reviewers, Generative Pre-trained Transformers 4.0 (GPT-4.0), and Bio_Clinical Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) evaluated the generated statements for validity. The evaluation by GPT-4.0 and Bio_ClinicalBERT was conducted with and without contextual information and training. Of the generated statements, 2207 were deemed valid by expert reviewers. GPT-4.0 showed a zero-shot AUC of 0.857, which aggravated with contextual information. Bio_ClinicalBERT, after training, significantly improved, reaching an AUC of 0.998. Bio_ClinicalBERT effectively validates auto-generated nursing statements, offering a promising solution to enhance and streamline healthcare documentation processes.
Medical subject headings
- Algorithms