Signal alignment for cross-datasets in P300 brain-computer interfaces.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38657615.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1088/1741-2552/ad430d.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<i>Objective.</i>Transfer learning has become an important issue in the brain-computer interface (BCI) field, and studies on subject-to-subject transfer within the same dataset have been performed. However, few studies have been performed on dataset-to-dataset transfer, including paradigm-to-paradigm transfer. In this study, we propose a signal alignment (SA) for P300 event-related potential (ERP) signals that is intuitive, simple, computationally less expensive, and can be used for cross-dataset transfer learning.<i>Approach.</i>We proposed a linear SA that uses the P300's latency, amplitude scale, and reverse factor to transform signals. For evaluation, four datasets were introduced (two from conventional P300 Speller BCIs, one from a P300 Speller with face stimuli, and the last from a standard auditory oddball paradigm).<i>Results.</i>Although the standard approach without SA had an average precision (AP) score of 25.5%, the approach demonstrated a 35.8% AP score, and we observed that the number of subjects showing improvement was 36.0% on average. Particularly, we confirmed that the Speller dataset with face stimuli was more comparable with other datasets.<i>Significance.</i>We proposed a simple and intuitive way to align ERP signals that uses the characteristics of ERP signals. The results demonstrated the feasibility of cross-dataset transfer learning even between datasets with different paradigms.
Medical subject headings
- Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Event-Related Potentials, P300
- Electroencephalography