How far are we off? Analyzing the accuracy of surgical margin relocation in the head and neck.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38702976.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.27793 and PMC identifier 12032842.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Positive surgical margin rates remain high in head and neck cancer surgery. Relocation is challenging given the complex, three-dimensional (3D) anatomy. Prospective, multi-institutional study to determine accuracy of head and neck surgeons and pathologists relocating margins on virtual 3D specimen models using written descriptions from pathology reports. Using 3D models of 10 head and neck surgical specimens, each participant relocated 20 mucosal margins (10 perpendicular, 10 shave). A total of 32 participants, 23 surgeons and 9 pathologists, marked 640 margins. Of the 320 marked perpendicular margins, 49.7% were greater than 1 centimeter from the true margin with a mean relocation error of 10.2 mm. Marked shave margins overlapped with the true margin a mean 54% of the time, with no overlap in 44 of 320 (13.8%) shave margins. Surgical margin relocation is imprecise and challenging even for experienced surgeons and pathologists. New communication technologies are needed.
Medical subject headings
- Margins of Excision
- Head and Neck Neoplasms