<sup>68</sup>Ga-Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitor PET/CT Improves Detection of Intermediate and Low-Grade Sarcomas and Identifies Candidates for Radiopharmaceutical Therapy.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38724279.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.123.267248.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) is often highly expressed by sarcoma cells and by sarcoma-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. This makes it a promising target for imaging and therapy. The level of FAP expression and the diagnostic value of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP inhibitor (FAPI) PET for sarcoma subtypes are unknown. We assessed the diagnostic performance and accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET in various bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. Potential eligibility for FAP-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (FAP-RPT) was evaluated. <b>Methods:</b> This prospective observational trial enrolled 200 patients with bone and soft-tissue sarcoma who underwent <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET/CT and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT (186/200, or 93%) for staging or restaging. The number of lesions detected and the uptake (SUV<sub>max</sub>) of the primary tumor, lymph nodes, and visceral and bone metastases were analyzed. The Wilcoxon test was used for semiquantitative assessment. The association of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI uptake intensity, histopathologic grade, and FAP expression in sarcoma biopsy samples was analyzed using Spearman <i>r</i> correlation. The impact of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET on clinical management was investigated using questionnaires before and after PET/CT. Eligibility for FAP-RPT was defined by an SUV<sub>max</sub> greater than 10 for all tumor regions. <b>Results:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI uptake was heterogeneous among sarcoma subtypes. The 3 sarcoma entities with the highest uptake (mean SUV<sub>max</sub> ± SD) were solitary fibrous tumor (24.7 ± 11.9), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (18.8 ± 13.1), and leiomyosarcoma (15.2 ± 10.2). Uptake of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI versus <sup>18</sup>F-FDG was significantly higher in low-grade sarcomas (10.4 ± 8.5 vs. 7.0 ± 4.5, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and in potentially malignant intermediate or unpredictable sarcomas without a World Health Organization grade (not applicable [NA]; 22.3 ± 12.5 vs. 8.5 ± 10.0, <i>P</i> = 0.0004), including solitary fibrous tumor. The accuracy, as well as the detection rates, of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI was higher than that of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in low-grade sarcomas (accuracy, 92.2 vs. 80.0) and NA sarcomas (accuracy, 96.9 vs. 81.9). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI uptake and the histopathologic FAP expression score (<i>n</i> = 89) were moderately correlated (Spearman <i>r</i> = 0.43, <i>P</i> < 0.0002). Of 138 patients, 62 (45%) with metastatic sarcoma were eligible for FAP-RPT. <b>Conclusion:</b> In patients with low-grade and NA sarcomas, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET demonstrates uptake, detection rates, and accuracy superior to those of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET. <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI PET criteria identified eligibility for FAP-RPT in about half of sarcoma patients.
Medical subject headings
- Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
- Sarcoma
- Radiopharmaceuticals