Effects of flipped classroom teaching in anaesthesiology residents: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38803261.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084362 and PMC identifier 11129030.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The flipped classroom teaching model is widely used in medical education and is indicated to be better than traditional lecture approaches in many medical specialties. Emerging studies have evaluated the effects of the flipped classroom teaching model on anaesthesiology residents. This protocol aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether the flipped classroom teaching model is superior to traditional teaching methods for anaesthesiology residents. Seven databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and the VIP database, will be systematically searched from their inception to 1 June 2024. Randomised controlled trials that compared the effects of flipped classrooms versus traditional teaching methods in anaesthesiology residents will be included. The primary outcome will be the theoretical knowledge score. The secondary outcomes will include skill scores and the proportion of anaesthesiology residents who preferred the flipped classroom model. RevMan V.5.4 software will be used to perform the statistical analysis. The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach will assess the quality of evidence. Ethical approval is not applicable to this protocol. The results of this study will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. CRD42024497935.
Medical subject headings
- Systematic Reviews as Topic
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Anesthesiology
- Internship and Residency