Assessment of CSF Dynamics Using Infusion Study: Tips and Tricks.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38810871.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.131.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus, secondary chronic hydrocephalus, and other cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disorders are often challenging to diagnose. Since shunt surgery is usually the only therapeutic option and carries significant morbidity, optimal patient selection is crucial. The tap test is the most commonly used prognostic test to confirm the diagnosis but lacks sensitivity. The lumbar infusion study (LIS) appears to be a better option, offering additional information on brain dynamics without increasing morbidity. However, this technique remains underused. In this narrative review, supported by the extensive experience of several European expert centers, we detail the physiological basis, indications, and CSF dynamics parameters that can be measured. We also discuss technical modalities and variations, including one versus 2 needles, patient positioning, and the site of CSF measurement, as well as in vivo shunt testing. Finally, we discuss the limitations and morbidity associated with the LIS. This review aims to assist teams wishing to incorporate LIS into their screening tools for chronic hydrocephalus and other CSF disorders.
Medical subject headings
- Hydrocephalus