Care <b>F</b>irst-<b>Fu</b>nd <b>L</b>ater (CareFFuL): an end-of-life home care quality improvement project.

Abstract

Previous work found referrals for end-of-life care are made late in the dying process and assessment processes for care funding, through continuing healthcare fast-track funding often inhibit people being able to die at home. The average time to discharge was 6.3 days and 29% died in hospital, as median survival was only 15 days.We aimed to support discharge to home within 1 day by December 2023 for patients, wishing to die at home, referred to the end-of-life discharge team in a medium-sized district general hospital in Southwest England.In phase 1, we identified 13 people on a patient-by-patient basis, learning from obstacles. Barriers identified included sourcing of equipment, communication between teams and clunky paperwork. Median time to discharge was 2 days (range within 24 hours to 8 days) with 2/13 (15.4%) dying prior to discharge. In phase 2, we extended the pilot, and 104 patients were identified; 94 people were discharged to home, with a median of wait of 1 day (range 0-7) to discharge, and 10 (9.6%) died prior to discharge (median 1 day; range 0-4). Median survival from discharge for the 94 who achieved their wishes to go home to die was 9 days (range 1-205 days). Only 26/94 (27.7%) people survived more than 30 days.Rapid decision-making and structures to support home-based end-of-life care can support more people to die in their preferred place of care, by using a community-based rapid response team instead of, or in parallel with continuing healthcare fast-track funding referral applications. Current pathways and funding models are not fit for purpose in an urgent care scenario when we have only one chance to get it right.