The Diagnostic Accuracy of SPECT Imaging in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Abstract

This meta-analysis and systematic review assessed the diagnostic accuracy of lung SPECT compared with lung planar imaging in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. A search of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases identified suitable articles published before October 2023. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT imaging modalities, including perfusion (Q) SPECT, ventilation (V)/Q SPECT, Q SPECT/CT, and V/Q SPECT/CT. Network meta-analyses were performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of SPECT and planar imaging in paired-design studies. Twenty-four articles (total n = 6576) were included in the analysis. For suspected acute PE, the respective sensitivity and specificity of SPECT imaging modalities were as follows: Q SPECT, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99; I2 = 49%) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.95; I2 = 94%); V/Q SPECT, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.94-0.98; I2 = 51%) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.98; I2 = 80%); Q SPECT/CT, 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.98; I2 = 66%) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.70-0.96; I2 = 87%); and V/Q SPECT/CT, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00; I2 = 7%) and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.97-1.00; I2 = 31%). The relative sensitivity and specificity of SPECT compared with planar imaging were 1.17 (95% CI, 1.06-1.30; P < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI, 1.00-1.29; P = 0.05), respectively. For suspected chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of SPECT imaging were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-1.00; I2 = 0%) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87-0.94; I2 = 0%), respectively. SPECT exhibited superior diagnostic performance for PE. V/Q SPECT/CT was the most accurate modality.