Safety of Gadoxetate Disodium for Hepatobiliary MRI in Children and Adolescents.

Kim, Pyeong Hwa; Hwang, Jae-Yeon; Choi, Young Hun; Yoon, Hee Mang; Lee, Choong Wook · Radiology · 2024

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

Background Despite a proven role in the characterization of liver lesions, use of the gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) gadoxetate disodium at MRI is limited in children due to a lack of comparative safety data. Purpose To evaluate the safety of the GBCA gadoxetate disodium (a linear ionic hepatobiliary contrast agent [HBA]) in children and adolescents, compared with extracellular contrast agents (ECA). Materials and Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted in children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger who underwent HBA-enhanced MRI at one of three tertiary hospitals from January 2010 to December 2022. The incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events was compared between MRI examinations with a HBA and those with ECA. Severity was categorized according to American College of Radiology guidelines (mild, moderate, or severe). <i>(a)</i> Propensity score matching using multivariable logistic regression models and <i>(b)</i> inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis based on nine covariates (age, sex, asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic urticaria or atopy, food allergy, drug allergy, premedication, and history of GBCA-associated adverse events) were used for confounder adjustment. Results A total of 1629 MRI examinations (ECA, <i>n</i> = 1256; HBA, <i>n</i> = 373) in 1079 patients were included (mean age, 8.6 years ± 6.5; 566 girls). The per-examination incidence of GBCA-associated acute adverse events showed no evidence of a difference, with rates of 0.9% (11 of 1256 examinations) for ECA and 1.3% (five of 373 examinations) for HBA (odds ratio [OR], 1.55 [95% CI: 0.54, 4.46]; <i>P</i> = .42). Acute adverse events were all mild with ECA, whereas with HBA, they were mild for four patients and moderate for one patient. There was no evidence of a difference in the incidence of acute adverse events, even in propensity score matching (OR, 1.33 [95% CI: 0.30, 5.96]; <i>P</i> = .71) and inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis (OR, 0.84 [95% CI: 0.25, 2.86]; <i>P</i> = .78). Conclusion Gadoxetate disodium showed no difference in acute adverse events compared with ECA in children and adolescents, with further large-scale pediatric studies required to confirm its safety. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article</i>. See also the editorial by Otero in this issue.

Medical subject headings