Can the 128-Hz tuning fork be an alternative to the biothesiometer for diabetic peripheral neuropathy screening? A cross-sectional study in a tertiary hospital in East India.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38862223.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082193 and PMC identifier 11168183.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Diabetic neuropathy is frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. Logistic problems accompany the routine use of the biothesiometer. Hence, we attempted to find a more easily available alternative. 149 patients with diabetes visiting the outpatient endocrinology clinic were assessed for vibration sense using a 128-Hz tuning fork (absolute timing method) and a biothesiometer. A reading of >25 V on the biothesiometer (known as vibration perception threshold or VPT) was taken as the diagnostic criterion for severe neuropathy while >15 V was used as an indicator of the mild form. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated by constructing the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The timed tuning fork (TTF) test showed a statistically significant correlation with the VPT measurements (r=-0.5, p=0.000). Using the VPT findings as a reference, a timed tuning fork cut-off of 4.8 s was 76% sensitive and 77% specific in diagnosing mild neuropathy while absent tuning fork sensation demonstrated 70% sensitivity and 90% specificity in detecting severe neuropathy. The tuning fork test demonstrated significant sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing diabetic peripheral neuropathy when compared against the biothesiometer. A cut-off of 4.8 s can be a useful indicator of the early stages of onset of the condition.
Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Vibration
- Tertiary Care Centers
- Sensitivity and Specificity
- Sensory Thresholds