Using cerebrospinal fluid nanopore sequencing assay to diagnose tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective cohort study in China.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38862231.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080904 and PMC identifier 11168130.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of nanopore sequencing for the early diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis (TBM) using cerebrospinal fluid and compared it with acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear, mycobacterial growth indicator tube culture and Xpert <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF). Single-centre retrospective study. The Tuberculosis Diagnosis and Treatment Center of Zhejiang Chinese and Western Medicine Integrated Hospital. We enrolled 64 adult patients with presumptive TBM admitted to our hospital from August 2021 to August 2023. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of AFB smear, culture, Xpert MTB/RIF and nanopore sequencing to evaluate their diagnostic efficacy compared with a composite reference standard for TBM. Among these 64 patients, all tested negative for TBM by AFB smear. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 11.11%, 100%, 100% and 32.2% for culture, 13.33%, 100%, 100% and 2.76% for Xpert MTB/RIF, and 77.78%, 100%, 100% and 65.52% for nanopore sequencing, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the nanopore sequencing test was significantly higher than that of conventional testing methods used to detect TBM.
Medical subject headings
- Tuberculosis, Meningeal
- Nanopore Sequencing
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- Sensitivity and Specificity