Where and what separates rural from urban hospital closures?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38895909.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jhm.13438.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Despite the recent closure of several high-profile metropolitan hospitals, investigations into risk factors for metropolitan hospital closures have been limited. The goal of this study was to describe metropolitan hospitals that closed and compare them to metropolitan hospitals that remain open and micropolitan and rural hospitals that closed using American Hospital Association Annual Survey Data from 2010 to 2021. We independently verified hospitals reported as closed in the Annual Survey and examined the hospital characteristics associated with closure using bivariate statistics and logistic regression. We found that metropolitan hospitals that closed (n = 142) were more likely to be for-profit (66.9% vs. 29.7%, p < .0001; adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.93, 4.81) and to come from a state that did not expand Medicaid (45.1% vs. 29.4%, p < .0001; AOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.16, 2.38). Policies tailored to metropolitan hospitals should be developed to identify at-risk hospitals and mitigate the effect of closures on patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders.
Medical subject headings
- Health Facility Closure
- Hospitals, Rural
- Hospitals, Urban