A machine-learning-based alternative to phylogenetic bootstrap.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 38940166.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae255 and PMC identifier 11211842.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Currently used methods for estimating branch support in phylogenetic analyses often rely on the classic Felsenstein's bootstrap, parametric tests, or their approximations. As these branch support scores are widely used in phylogenetic analyses, having accurate, fast, and interpretable scores is of high importance. Here, we employed a data-driven approach to estimate branch support values with a probabilistic interpretation. To this end, we simulated thousands of realistic phylogenetic trees and the corresponding multiple sequence alignments. Each of the obtained alignments was used to infer the phylogeny using state-of-the-art phylogenetic inference software, which was then compared to the true tree. Using these extensive data, we trained machine-learning algorithms to estimate branch support values for each bipartition within the maximum-likelihood trees obtained by each software. Our results demonstrate that our model provides fast and more accurate probability-based branch support values than commonly used procedures. We demonstrate the applicability of our approach on empirical datasets. The data supporting this work are available in the Figshare repository at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25050554.v1, and the underlying code is accessible via GitHub at https://github.com/noaeker/bootstrap_repo.
Medical subject headings
- Phylogeny
- Machine Learning
- Software
- Algorithms