Family medicine residents' perspectives on shared decision-making: A mixed methods study.

Abstract

To 1) examine the willingness of residents to undertake shared decision-making and 2) explore whether the willingness to engage in shared decision-making is influenced by the perceived stakes of a clinical situation. Sequential mixed methods design. Phase One: Family Medicine residents completed IncorpoRATE, a seven-item measure of clinician willingness to engage in shared decision making. Mean IncorpoRATE scores were calculated. Phase Two: We interviewed residents from phase one to explore their perceptions of high versus low stakes situations. Transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. IncorpoRATE scores indicated a greater willingness to engage in shared decision-making when the stakes of the decision were perceived as low (7.59 [2.0]) compared to high (4.38 [2.5]). Interviews revealed that residents held variable views of the stakes of similar clinical decisions. Residents are more willing to engage in shared decision-making when the stakes of the situation are perceived to be low. However, the interpretation of the stakes of clinical situations varies. Further research is needed to explore how shared decision making is understood by residents in Family Medicine and when they view the process of shared decision-making to be most appropriate.