On the use of steady flow rates for approximating flow instabilities and vibrations in intracranial aneurysms.

Abstract

Recent computational and experimental studies of intracranial aneurysms have revealed potential mechanisms of aneurysm bruits and murmurs, driven by flow instabilities rather than by stable pulsatile flow. Some of these studies have been conducted under the assumption of constant flow rate (steady flow); however the validity of this assumption has not been evaluated for high-frequency flow instability, or vibrations from fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations. We evaluated the time-averaged wall shear stress, flow instability and vibration amplitude of steady flow simulations, performed at both cycle-averaged and peak-systolic flow rates, and compared these to recent pulsatile FSI simulations. Wall shear stress fields of pulsatile flow (time-averaged and peak values) were well-approximated by the respective steady-flow FSI simulations, and the spatial distribution and frequency content of flow instability and vibrations were reasonably approximated by the steady flow simulations at peak-systolic flow rates. However, the level of flow instability and vibration was generally over-predicted by the steady flow simulations at peak-systolic flow rates as flow remained unstable for longer than in the pulsatile simulation, while no flow instability was detected for steady flow at cycle-averaged flow rates. Additionally, the amplitude of flow instability and vibration fluctuated considerably in the steady flow simulations, while the pulsatile simulations exhibited consistent vibration amplitudes (less than 10 % variation at peak systole between cycles). Finally, steady flow simulations at peak-systolic conditions required 2-3x more compute time than the pulsatile simulations for the same time duration. Therefore, we recommend using pulsatile flow simulations when investigating vibrations and flow instabilities.