Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures-Beyond B2.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39110721.
- Also identified by PMC identifier 11309721.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
The proliferation of hip arthroplasty has seen concomitant increases in periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs). The most common pattern involves fracture at the level of a loose prosthesis (B2). B2 PFFs have a unique mechanopathogenesis linked to the tendency of polished taper-slip cemented stems to subside in the cement. Such stems carry a much higher PFF risk than other cemented designs. Mega-data, consistent across national registries, suggest that increasing application of the taper-slip principle has resulted in the emergence of highly polished, very low friction cemented prostheses. These have the propensity to migrate within the cement, increasing B2 PFF risk. This would explain the strong association between cobalt-chromium stems and PFF. Is PFF the mode of failure of polished taper-slip stems rather than aseptic loosening? Established wisdom teaches that B2 PFFs should be managed with revision surgery. There is a large body of new evidence that, in certain instances, fixation results in outcomes at least equivalent to revision arthroplasty, with shorter surgical time, decreased transfusion requirements, and lower dislocation risk. This is so in B2 PFFs around cemented polished taper-slip stems with an intact bone-cement interface. We outline advances in understanding of B2 PFF with special reference to mechanopathogenesis and indications for fixation.
Medical subject headings
- Periprosthetic Fractures
- Femoral Fractures
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Hip Prosthesis
- Reoperation
- Prosthesis Failure
Anatomy
- femur
- hip