A meta-analysis comparing complications of anterior versus dorsal osteotomy and plating for distal radial malunions.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39118500.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934241254962.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the incidences of complications, reoperations and hardware removal between anterior and dorsal plating after corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radial malunions. A total of 403 patients were included; 253 patients underwent anterior corrective osteotomy and 150 underwent dorsal corrective osteotomy. Mean follow-up was 30 months. Anterior plating was associated with fewer reoperations (9% vs. 28%), less hardware removal (3% vs. 18%) and comparable major complications (5% vs. 6%) compared to dorsal plating. The adjusted model showed a significant reduction (approximately 85%) in the odds of reoperation and hardware removal in the anterior group. There was no difference in major or minor complications between the groups. Surgeons should be fully aware of the increased risks when using dorsal plate fixation after corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radial malunions.
Medical subject headings
- Bone Plates
- Fractures, Malunited
- Osteotomy
- Postoperative Complications
- Radius Fractures
- Reoperation
Anatomy
- radius