Native hip geometry restoration in total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of eight different short stems.

Abstract

To compare different types of short stems (SS) in terms of native hip geometry reproducibility, analyzing centrum-collum-diaphyseal angle (CCD) and femoral offset (FO). These parameters allow the SS to be adapted to patient's anatomy in order to ensure better functional outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). A total of 387 cases of SS met the inclusion criteria. CCD and FO were measured using MediCAD® software Version 6 in preoperative (preop-) and postoperative (postop-) X-rays at 6-12 months after surgery. Considering preop-CCD, the sample was divided into three groups: ≤ 124.9° (A); 125°-129.9° (B); and ≥ 130°(C). Preop- and postop-CCD and FO and the respective average difference (Δ) were examined considering the SS individually and within groups, to verify reproducibility of these parameters. The SS considered were eight: Fitmore Zimmer, Pulchra Adler, TRIS Adler, Trifit Corin, Trilock Depuy, Actis Depuy, Profemur Microport, and SMF Smith&Nephew. Groups A, B, and C consisted, respectively, of 113, 124, and 150 cases. Considering all cases, there was a statistically significant (p < 0.05) increase in CCD and FO with surgery. Overall, Trifit and Trilock stems were the best in reproducing preop-CCD, Trifit itself followed by Pulchra and Profemur for preop-FO. In groups A and C, the reproduction of preop-CCD was better than preop-FO, in contrast in group B. With regard to preop-CCD reproduction, in group A Trifit and Pulchra, in group B Fitmore and Trifit, and in group C Fitmore and Pulchra were the best. Fitmore in group A, SMF in group B, Pulchra and Trilock in group C were the worst in reproducing preop-FO. Each hip anatomy is unique, and reproduction of preop-CCD and preop-FO can be achieved with different SS characteristics. Accurate knowledge of the stems and performing correct preop- planning are crucial to allow the best restoration of the patient's native hip geometry in THA.