Evolution of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Design Rationales and Where We Are Now.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39168092.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-01265.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) will soon reach its 20-year anniversary in the United States and has now become the most performed shoulder arthroplasty in the United States. The evolution from Grammont style implants to lateralized designs continues to generate debate as comparable outcomes have been reported with both types of systems. While early literature focused on fixation and expanded indications, recent studies have evaluated component design and position and their effect on functional outcomes and complications. The purpose of this article was to provide a synopsis of design rationales of current RSA prostheses and review outcomes related to RSA design and position.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- shoulder