Intervention to improve adverse event reporting in the emergency department: Protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39172963.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0306885 and PMC identifier 11340945.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Adverse event reporting is crucial for improving patient safety and identifying areas for improvement in the emergency department. Many interventions have been employed in that regard, and have been found to increase adverse event reporting rates in various settings. All published research that studied the various interventions and their effectiveness on adverse event reporting in the Emergency Department will be reviewed in this paper. CINAHL, PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Reviews Library, EMBASE, Scopus, OVID, Science Direct and Web of Science will all be searched. Studies published since January 2000 that investigated the interventions to improve adverse event reporting will be included. Two independent reviewers will execute the selection and extraction process, and we will carry out a qualitative synthesis. A meta-analysis, if possible, will be undertaken. The present study will summarize interventions to improve adverse event reporting. It will also determine effective approaches to enhancing adverse event reporting in the emergency department. The outcome of the study will provide novel dimensions into possible interventions to improve patient safety through adverse event reporting. Protocol registration and reporting: PROSPERO CRD42023414795.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Service, Hospital
- Meta-Analysis as Topic
- Systematic Reviews as Topic