Postdischarge Outcomes and Health Care Utilization Among Hispanic/Latinx Injury Survivors: English-language Proficiency Matters.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 39176837.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006512.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We sought to compare postdischarge outcomes and health care utilization between English-speaking non-Hispanic White (NHW), English-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (ESHL), and Spanish-speaking Hispanic/Latinx (SSHL) survivors of traumatic injury. While there is evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in health care utilization and postdischarge outcomes after injury, the role of English-language proficiency in these disparities remains unclear. Moderate to severely injured adults from 3 level-1 trauma centers completed an interview in English or Spanish between 6 and 12 months postinjury to assess physical health-related quality-of-life (SF-12-PCS), return to work, and postdischarge health care utilization. The language used in the interview was used as a proxy for English-language proficiency, and participants were categorized as either NHW (reference), ESHL, or SSHL. Multivariable regression models estimated independent associations between language and race/ethnicity with SF-12-PCS, return to work, and postdischarge health care utilization outcomes. A total of 3304 injury survivors were followed: 2977 (90%) NHW, 203 (6%) ESHL, and 124 (4%) SSHL. In adjusted analyses, no significant differences were observed between ESHL and NHW injury survivors for any outcomes at 6 to 12 months postinjury. However, SSHL injury survivors exhibited a lower mean SF-12-PCS (41.6 vs. 38.5), -3.07 (95% CI=-5.47, -0.66; P =0.012), decreased odds of returning to work [odds ratio (OR)=0.47; CI=0.27-0.81; P =0.007], and were less likely to engage in non-injury-related outpatient visits, such as primary care visits (OR=0.45; 95% CI=0.28-0.73; P =0.001), compared with NHW patients. Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors have worse postdischarge outcomes and lower non-injury-related health care utilization than NHW if they have limited English-language proficiency. Addressing LEP-related barriers to care could help mitigate outcome and health care utilization disparities among Hispanic/Latinx injury survivors.
Medical subject headings
- Hispanic or Latino
- Wounds and Injuries
- Patient Acceptance of Health Care
- Limited English Proficiency
- Language